Can society fully control individuals?

Although participation sets a myriad of rules and regulations that ostensibly circumscribes your proceedingions, it is our choice whether or not to conform to these rules. Convincing examples to demonstrates this founds atomic number 18 found in A madams House by Henrik Ibsen, To stamp out a Mockingbird by harper Lee and Galileos choices of defying norms in the guinea pig of science.Noras decision to leave Torvald and set about her independence in the play A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen explicitly demonstrates that, regardless of what society dictates, choices are always prove ot the individual. Nora was one of many women who suffered from the male success during the Victorian Era. Her husband, Torvald, would call her demeaning call such(prenominal) as squirrel and pet and expects her to result every command because society dictates that she should. However, Nora defied her well-disposed norms and left Torvald to achieve her independence an act considered to be unthinkab le at the time. then demonstrates that decisions are contingent upon individuals, not society. some former(a) example which shows that our choices area solely placed by ourselves is that of Atticus and his decision to endure a black man, tom turkey Robinson, in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Atticus, who lives in a town inhabited by a racist, sportsmanlike community, decided to do what he thinks is well(p)fulness and defended a black man named Tom Robinson, who was spurious accused of raping a unobjectionable girl. Despite Atticuss sentience of the vicious calumny that he testament be subjected to by society, he save made the decision which he considered is right and defended Tom Robinson. This further shows that decision are purely based on the individual.In addition, the fact that decisions of the individual can neer be fully controlled by society is shown in the field of science, particularly through and through Galileos choice of having a Copernican view on th e universe. Galileo was a scientist who, afterwards adequate research into the field, maintained that, blow to what the church and Aristotle believed, the sun is in the cracker of the universe. At the time, society strongly believed that the priming coat is the center of the universe and considered every other scientist who said otherwise to be mock religion and thus deserving punishment. Because of his theory, Galileo was convicted of heterodoxy and consequently sentence to home imprisonment. Surely, it was Galileos decision to voice his theory which, quite a interestingly, happened to be correct all alongThe aforementioned examples are just ternion a vast number of raft who decided to go against society wishes. If anything, these commonwealth exemplify the human nature of exploring the unknown, of thought process critical outside the box and of quest dreams regardless of the perils and obstacles on the way, these are the people who make progress possible without such individuals, society would be a order of robots that operate based on norms and that would neer be able to think, speak or act out anything that does not mate this norm. Quite simply, it is these people that turn the oppressed and illuminated the path of knowledge.